Open Proof Network

Problems

Every problem on the record, with the statements its proof needs. Nothing is ranked; hovertap any term for what it means. Needs a steward 20: become one in one short form.

Legendopen No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier needs a witness Left open by a proof skeleton and waiting only for its witness. Supplying one is the work here and anyone may do it; once it merges, the statement is open for proof. protocol: blocked · cause witness-missing · on the frontier blocked Waits on other statements, or on a definition that has not been checked yet. Not accepting work. A statement waiting only for its witness is not blocked in this sense: it needs a witness. protocol: blocked proved A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved Explained A person who can explain the proof without the tool that produced it has signed the explainer. This is the count the network is judged by. protocol: digested Written up A paper or note about the proof exists. protocol: written-up Steward The named mathematician who has committed to understand and write up whatever the network produces on a problem. The rule that a problem without one would refuse work is announced and not yet enforced: such a problem still accepts work and says so. protocol: steward (D-32) statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only Work on A courtesy signal to others that you are working on a statement. It expires on its own and never blocks anyone. protocol: claim (D-25)
Legend: what the terms mean ▾
open
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now.
needs a witness
Left open by a proof skeleton and waiting only for its witness. Supplying one is the work here and anyone may do it; once it merges, the statement is open for proof.
blocked
Waits on other statements, or on a definition that has not been checked yet. Not accepting work. A statement waiting only for its witness is not blocked in this sense: it needs a witness.
proved
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained.
Explained
A person who can explain the proof without the tool that produced it has signed the explainer. This is the count the network is judged by.
Written up
A paper or note about the proof exists.
Steward
The named mathematician who has committed to understand and write up whatever the network produces on a problem. The rule that a problem without one would refuse work is announced and not yet enforced: such a problem still accepts work and says so.
statement unchecked
Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must.
Work on
A courtesy signal to others that you are working on a statement. It expires on its own and never blocks anyone.
erdos-1003open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Are there infinitely many solutions to $\phi(n) = \phi(n+1)$, where $\phi$ is the Euler totient function?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/1003
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1003the problem's statementopen1 attemptWork on this →
erdos-1050proved Its root statement has a merged proof. Not yet explained or written up. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Erdős Problem 1050. The series $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2^n - 3}$ is irrational. The source sum runs over $n \ge 1$; as a tsum over ℕ (which starts at $0$) it is reindexed $n \mapsto n + 1$, i.e. $\sum_{n=0}^\infty 1/(2^{n+1} - 3)$.

Statement from formal-conjectures (FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/1050.lean) · erdosproblems.com/1050; the record lists no licensed source text.
ProvedExplainedWritten up Calibration target, no steward needed 6 files need words View the graph →
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1050the problem's statementproved2 attemptsView proof →
ShowHide 13 more statements, 1 open
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) erdos-1050--h1left open by a proof skeletonsuperseded0 attemptsBlocked$\exists\, a,b:\ \bigl(\forall n\in\mathbb{N},\ b_n\,T-a_n\neq 0\bigr)\ \wedge\ \lim_{n\to\infty}\bigl(b_n\,T-a_n\bigr)=0,\qquad T=\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{m+3}-3}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1050--h1-v2left open by a proof skeletonproved4 attemptsView proof →$\exists\, a,b:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}\ \ \bigl(\forall n\in\mathbb{N},\ b_n\,T-a_n\neq 0\bigr)\ \wedge\ \lim_{n\to\infty}\bigl(b_n\,T-a_n\bigr)=0,\qquad T=\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{m+3}-3}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1050--h1-v2--h1left open by a proof skeletonopen2 attemptsWork on this →$T=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{n+3}-3}=\frac15+\frac1{13}+\frac1{29}+\frac1{61}+\cdots\ \notin\ \mathbb{Q}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1050--h1-v2--h2left open by a proof skeletonproved1 attemptView proof →$\exists\, a,b:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}\ \ \forall n\ge 1:\qquad b(n)\,z-a(n)\;=\;9^n\,W(n)\,E(n)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1050--h1-v2--h2--h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\exists\, a:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}\ \ \forall n\ge 1:\qquad a(n)\;=\;9^n\,W(n)\,\bigl(S_1(n)-S_2(n)\bigr)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1050--h1-v2--h3derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \exists d\in\mathbb{N}:\qquad d>0,\quad d^2\le 2^{3n^2},\quad d\,Q_x(n)\in\mathbb{Z},\quad d\,A_q(n)\in\mathbb{Z}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1050--h1-v2--h4derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}:\qquad R_n>0\quad\wedge\quad R_n^{2}\,2^{4n^2}\le 2^{2n+4},\qquad R_n=3T\,Q_x(n)-A_q(n),\quad T=\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{m+3}-3}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-180d8b72 erdos_1050_pade_remainder_boundproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}:\qquad R_n>0\quad\wedge\quad R_n^{2}\,2^{4n^2}\le 2^{2n+4},\qquad R_n=3T\,Q_x(n)-A_q(n),\quad T=\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{m+3}-3}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-1a5ab7c3 erdos_1050_upper_half_mersenne_clearsproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n,k\in\mathbb{N},\ k\le n,\ \ \forall c:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{Z}\ \ \exists z\in\mathbb{Z}:\qquad z=\Bigl(\prod_{\lfloor n/2\rfloor<m\le n}(2^m-1)\Bigr)\cdot\sum_{j=0}^{k}\frac{c_j}{2^{\,k-j}-1}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-440db0f9 erdos_1050_gauss_binom_two_intproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \exists z\in\mathbb{Z}:\qquad z=\prod_{i=0}^{k-1}\frac{2^{\,n-i}-1}{2^{\,i+1}-1}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-eb1219eb erdos_1050_hden_small_casesproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\{5,7\}\ \ \exists d\in\mathbb{N}:\qquad d>0,\quad d^2\le 2^{3n^2},\quad d\,Q_x(n)\in\mathbb{Z},\quad d\,A_q(n)\in\mathbb{Z}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-f2b55478 erdos_1050_pade_remainder_coeffproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n<m:\quad \sum_{j=0}^{n}\frac{(-1)^j\,2^{j(j-1)/2}\prod_{i=0}^{j-1}\frac{2^{\,n-i}-1}{2^{\,i+1}-1}\prod_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{2^{\,2n-j-i}-1}{2^{\,i+1}-1}}{2^{\,m-j}-1} \;=\;\frac{2^{n^2}\prod_{i=0}^{n-1}(2^{\,i+1}-1)\prod_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{2^{\,m-n-1-i}-1}{2^{\,i+1}-1}}{\prod_{j=0}^{n}(2^{\,m-j}-1)}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-ffd3137a erdos_1050_pade_numerator_closed_formproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall k\le n:\quad \sum_{j=0}^{k}\frac{Q_c(n,j)}{2^{\,k-j}-1}\;=\;Q_c(n,k)\Bigl(\sum_{i=0}^{n-1}\frac{1}{1-2^{\,n+1+i-k}}-\sum_{b=0}^{k-1}\frac{2^{b+1}}{2^{b+1}-1}-\sum_{b=0}^{n-k-1}\frac{1}{1-2^{b+1}}\Bigr)+\sum_{b=0}^{n-k-1}\frac{Q_c(n,k+b+1)\,2^{b+1}}{2^{b+1}-1}$
erdos-1065open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Are there infinitely many primes $p$ such that $p = 2^k * q + 1$ for some prime $q$ and $k ≥ 0$? This is mentioned as B46 in Unsolved Problems in Number Theory by Richard K. Guy

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/1065
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1065the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-1094open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

For all $n\ge 2k$ the least prime factor of $\binom{n}{k}$ is $\le\max(n/k,k)$, with only finitely many exceptions.

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/1094
ProvedExplainedWritten up Steward · Michael Higgins self-admitted 112 files need words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094the problem's statementopen2 attemptsWork on this →
ShowHide 64 more statements, 53 open
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall k\ge 1:\quad \Bigl\{n\in\mathbb{N} \;:\; k^2\le n,\ \ \operatorname{lpf}\tbinom{n}{k} > \lfloor n/k\rfloor\Bigr\}\ \text{ is finite}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2derived by the compileropen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^2\le n,\ \ \operatorname{lpf}\tbinom{n}{k} > \lfloor n/k\rfloor \implies k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1left open by a proof skeletonopen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^2\le n<k^3,\ \ \operatorname{lpf}\tbinom{n}{k} > \lfloor n/k\rfloor \implies k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^3,\ \ \operatorname{lpf}\tbinom{n}{k} > k \implies k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^3,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>k,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\!\Bigl(\frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\Bigr)>k\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>k,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\!\Bigl(\frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\Bigr)>k\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k:\ 2k\le n<k^2,\ n \text{ prime},\ \operatorname{minFac}\binom nk>k \Rightarrow k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1--h1--h1--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k,q:\ 2k\le n<k^2,\ n=\gcd(n,k)\,q,\ q>k \text{ prime},\ \gcd(n,k)\ge2,\ \operatorname{minFac}\binom nk>k \Rightarrow k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1--h1--h2derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^2\le n<k^3,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>k,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\!\Bigl(\frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\Bigr)>k\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1--h1--h2--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k,q:\ k^2\le n<k^3,\ n=\gcd(n,k)\,q,\ q>k \text{ prime},\ \operatorname{minFac}\binom nk>k \Rightarrow k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h1--h1--h2--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k,p,q:\ k^2\le n<k^3,\ n=\gcd(n,k)\,pq,\ p,q>k \text{ prime},\ \operatorname{minFac}\binom nk>k \Rightarrow k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h4left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb N\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb N:\ 0<k,\ k^2\le n,\ n<k\bigl(k+3k^{21/40}\bigr),\ k\lfloor n/k\rfloor \mid k!,\ \operatorname{minFac}\binom nk>\lfloor n/k\rfloor\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h4--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^2\le n,\ \ n<k\bigl(k+3k^{21/40}\bigr),\ \ k\lfloor n/k\rfloor\mid k!,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>\lfloor n/k\rfloor,\ \ \frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\text{ prime}\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h4--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^2\le n,\ \ n<k\bigl(k+3k^{21/40}\bigr),\ \ k\lfloor n/k\rfloor\mid k!,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>\lfloor n/k\rfloor,\ \ n\text{ prime},\ \ \gcd(n,k)=1\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h4--h1--h2derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^2\le n,\ \ n<k\bigl(k+3k^{21/40}\bigr),\ \ k\lfloor n/k\rfloor\mid k!,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>\lfloor n/k\rfloor,\ \ \frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\text{ prime},\ \ 2\le\gcd(n,k)\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h1--h4--h1--h2--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k:\ \text{(the node's hypotheses)} \wedge 2 \le \gcd(n,k) < k \Rightarrow k \le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h2left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^3\le n,\ \ \operatorname{lpf}\tbinom{n}{k} > \lfloor n/k\rfloor \implies k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h2--h1left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists C>0\ \ \exists k_0\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \forall k\ge k_0:\qquad \frac{C\,k^{21/40}}{\log k}\ \le\ \#\bigl\{p\text{ prime}:\ k<p<k+k^{21/40}\bigr\}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2left open by a proof skeletonproved1 attemptView proof →$\neg\,\text{BHP}\ \ \lor\ \ \exists k_0\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\ge k_0\ \forall n\in\mathbb{Z}:\ \ 2k<n\le\exp\!\Bigl(\frac{(\log k)^2}{20\log\log k}\Bigr)\ \Longrightarrow\ \exists p\text{ prime},\ k<p<k+3k^{21/40},\ \ p\mid\prod_{i=1}^{k}(n-i)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h1left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\neg\,\text{BHP}\ \ \lor\ \ \exists k_0\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\ge k_0\ \forall n\in\mathbb{Z}:\ \ 2k<n\le\tfrac12\,k^{2-21/40}\ \Longrightarrow\ \exists p\text{ prime},\ k<p<k+3k^{21/40},\ \ p\mid\prod_{i=1}^{k}(n-i)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h2left open by a proof skeletonproved1 attemptView proof →$\neg\,\text{BHP}\ \ \lor\ \ \exists k_0\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\ge k_0\ \forall n\in\mathbb{Z}:\ \ \tfrac12\,k^{2-21/40}<n\le\frac{k^2}{(\log k)^2}\ \Longrightarrow\ \exists p\text{ prime},\ k<p<k+3k^{21/40},\ \ p\mid\prod_{i=1}^{k}(n-i)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h2--h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\exists k_0\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\ge k_0\ \forall n\in\mathbb{Z}:\ \ \tfrac12\,k^{2-21/40}<n\le\frac{k^2}{(\log k)^2}\ \Longrightarrow\ \#\Bigl\{m\in\mathbb{Z}:\ k<m<k+k^{21/40},\ \Bigl|\frac{n}{m}-\operatorname{round}\!\Bigl(\frac{n}{m}\Bigr)\Bigr|<\frac{1}{k^{1-21/40}}\Bigr\}<3+56\,k^{2\cdot 21/40-1}+\frac{k^{21/40}}{(\log k)^{2}}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h3left open by a proof skeletonproved1 attemptView proof →$\neg\,\text{BHP}\ \ \lor\ \ \exists k_0\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\ge k_0\ \forall n\in\mathbb{Z}:\ \ \frac{k^2}{(\log k)^2}<n\le\tfrac12\,k^{2+21/40}\ \Longrightarrow\ \exists p\text{ prime},\ k<p<k+3k^{21/40},\ \ p\mid\prod_{i=1}^{k}(n-i)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h3--h1derived by the compilerproved1 attemptView proof →$\#\Bigl\{m\in\mathbb{Z}:\ k<m<k+k^{21/40},\ \Bigl|\frac{n}{m}-\operatorname{round}\!\Bigl(\frac{n}{m}\Bigr)\Bigr|<\frac{1}{k^{1-21/40}}\Bigr\}<65536\,k^{21/40}\Bigl[\Bigl(\frac{n\,r!\,\lambda^r}{k^{r+1}}\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{2r-1}}+\Bigl(\frac{k^{r+21/40}}{n\,r!\,\lambda^r}\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{r-1}}+\Bigl(\frac{(r+1)\lambda}{k}\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{2r}}\Bigr]+2r\lambda$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h3--h1--h1derived by the compilerproved1 attemptView proof →$|S|<65536\,N\Bigl[(D_r\lambda^rW^2)^{\frac{1}{2r-1}}+\Bigl(\frac{\delta W^2}{D_r\lambda^r}\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{r-1}}+\Bigl(\frac{D_{r+1}\lambda W^2}{D_r}\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{2r}}\Bigr]+2r\lambda$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h3--h1--h1--h1derived by the compilerproved2 attemptsView proof →$65536\,X'<1\ \Longrightarrow\ |S'|<65536\,N'X'+2r\lambda',\qquad X'=(D'\lambda'^{\,r}W^2)^{\frac{1}{2r-1}}+\Bigl(\frac{\delta W^2}{D'\lambda'^{\,r}}\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{r-1}}+\Bigl(\frac{D_1'\lambda' W^2}{D'}\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{2r}}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h3--h1--h1--h1--h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\exists a:\{0,\dots,2r-1\}\to\mathbb{Z}:\quad \sum_{i}a_i w_i u_i^{\,j}=0\ (j<r),\qquad \sum_{i}a_i w_i u_i^{\,r}\ne 0,\qquad |a_i|\le\Bigl(\frac{256\,M}{r}\Bigr)^{r-1}W$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-1094--h2--h2--h2--h4left open by a proof skeletonproved1 attemptView proof →$\neg\,\text{BHP}\ \ \lor\ \ \exists k_0\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\ge k_0\ \forall n\in\mathbb{Z}:\ \ \tfrac12\,k^{2+21/40}<n\le\exp\!\Bigl(\frac{(\log k)^2}{20\log\log k}\Bigr)\ \Longrightarrow\ \exists p\text{ prime},\ k<p<k+3k^{21/40},\ \ p\mid\prod_{i=1}^{k}(n-i)$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h2--h3left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb N\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb N:\ 0<k,\ k^3\le n,\ \exp\!\Bigl(\frac{(\log k)^2}{20\,\log\log k}\Bigr)<n+1,\ k\lfloor n/k\rfloor \mid k!,\ \operatorname{minFac}\binom nk>\lfloor n/k\rfloor\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h2--h3--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^3\le n,\ \ \exp\!\Bigl(\frac{(\log k)^2}{20\log\log k}\Bigr)<n+1,\ \ k\lfloor n/k\rfloor\mid k!,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>\lfloor n/k\rfloor,\ \ \frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\text{ prime}\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h2--h2--h3--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ k^3\le n,\ \ \exp\!\Bigl(\frac{(\log k)^2}{20\log\log k}\Bigr)<n+1,\ \ k\lfloor n/k\rfloor\mid k!,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>\lfloor n/k\rfloor,\ \ \frac{n}{\gcd(n,k)}\text{ prime},\ \ k\nmid n\ \Longrightarrow\ k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3derived by the compileropen3 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ \operatorname{lpf}\tbinom{n}{k} > k \implies k\le K$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2 \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1left open by a proof skeletonopen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_1\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_1<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ even} \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_1\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_1<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ 3\mid k \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_1\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_1<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ 3\mid k,\ \ 5\mid k \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h1--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_2\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_2<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ 3\mid k,\ \ 5\nmid k,\ \ k \bmod 5 \le n \bmod 5 \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h2derived by the compileropen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K_2\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_2<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ 3\nmid k,\ \ k \bmod 3 \le n \bmod 3 \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h2--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_3\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_3<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ 3\nmid k,\ \ k \bmod q \le n \bmod q\ (q=3,5,7,11,13) \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h2--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ k\equiv 1 \pmod 3,\ \ 1\le n \bmod 3,\ \ k \bmod q \le n \bmod q\ (q=5,7,11,13) \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h2--h1--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ k\equiv 2 \pmod 3,\ \ n\equiv 2 \pmod 3,\ \ k \bmod q \le n \bmod q\ (q=5,7,11,13) \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h1--h3derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ 2\mid k,\ \ \bigl(\forall q\le k \text{ prime},\ q\mid n \Rightarrow q\mid k\bigr) \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K_2\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_2<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ odd},\ \ n \text{ odd} \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_1\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_1<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ odd},\ \ n \text{ odd},\ \ 3\mid k \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_1\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_1<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ odd},\ \ n \text{ odd},\ \ 3\mid k,\ \ 5\mid k \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h1--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_2\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_2<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ odd},\ \ n \text{ odd},\ \ 3\mid k,\ \ 5\nmid k,\ \ k \bmod 5 \le n \bmod 5 \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h2derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K_2\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_2<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ odd},\ \ n \text{ odd},\ \ 3\nmid k,\ \ k \bmod 3 \le n \bmod 3 \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h2--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ odd},\ \ n \text{ odd},\ \ k\equiv 1 \pmod 3 \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h2--h2derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists K\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K<k,\ \ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \ k \text{ odd},\ \ n \text{ odd},\ \ k\equiv 2 \pmod 3,\ \ n\equiv 2 \pmod 3 \implies \exists\,p\le k \text{ prime with } n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h2--h2--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$5 \mid k \Rightarrow \exists\, p \le k \text{ prime},\ n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h1--h2--h2--h2--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$0 < k \bmod 5 \le n \bmod 5 \Rightarrow \exists\, p \le k \text{ prime},\ n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h2left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists C, K_1\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_1<k,\ \ 2k\le n,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>k \implies k^2 \le C\cdot n\cdot\lfloor\log_2 k\rfloor$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h2--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\exists c\in\mathbb{R},\ c>0,\ \exists K_2\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_2<k,\ \ 2k\le n,\ \ \operatorname{minFac}\tbinom{n}{k}>k \implies k^{1+c} < n$
Left open by a proof skeleton and waiting only for its witness. Supplying one is the work here and anyone may do it; once it merges, the statement is open for proof. protocol: blocked · cause witness-missing · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h2--h1--h1derived by the compilerneeds a witness0 attemptsSupply a witness →$\exists c>0\,\exists K\,\forall n,k:\ K<k,\ 2k\le n<k^2,\ \mathrm{lpf}\binom{n}{k}>k \Rightarrow k^{1+c}<n$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h2--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\forall c>0\ \exists K_3\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_3<k,\ \ k^{1+c}<n<k^{7/4} \implies \exists\,p \text{ prime},\ \tfrac{k}{2}<p<k,\ \ p\mid\tbinom{n}{k}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h2--h3derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists C, K_4\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_4<k,\ \ k^{7/4}\le n,\ \ C\cdot n\cdot\lfloor\log_2 k\rfloor < k^2 \implies \exists\,p \text{ prime},\ \tfrac{k}{2}<p<k,\ \ p\mid\tbinom{n}{k}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\forall C\in\mathbb{N}\ \exists K_2\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_2<k,\ \ k^2\le C\cdot n\cdot\lfloor\log_2 k\rfloor,\ \ n<k^2 \implies \exists\,p \text{ prime},\ \tfrac{k}{2}<p<\tfrac{11k}{20},\ \ n \bmod p < k \bmod p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3--h1left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\exists K_3\in\mathbb{N}\ \forall k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_3<k \implies \frac{k}{100} \le \sum_{\substack{p \text{ prime}\\ k/2<p<11k/20}} \log p$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3--h1--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\forall \varepsilon>0\ \exists X\in\mathbb{R}\ \forall x\in\mathbb{R}:\quad X\le x \implies |\theta(x)-x| \le \varepsilon x$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\psi(x) = x + o(x)$, i.e. $\forall \varepsilon>0\ \exists X\ \forall x\ge X,\ |\psi(x)-x|\le\varepsilon x$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3--h1--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$f\ge0$, $\sum f(n)n^{-s}$ converges for $\Re s>1$ and $F(s)-A/(s-1)$ extends continuously to $\Re s\ge1$ $\Rightarrow$ $\frac1N\sum_{n<N}f(n)\to A$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3--h1--h1--h1--h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\sum_n \Lambda(n) n^{-s} - \frac{1}{s-1}$ extends continuously to $\Re s\ge 1$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3--h2left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\forall C\in\mathbb{N},\ \varepsilon>0\ \exists K_4\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad K_4<k,\ \ k^2\le C\cdot n\cdot\lfloor\log_2 k\rfloor,\ \ n<k^2 \implies \Bigl|\sum_{\substack{p \text{ prime}\\ k/2<p<11k/20}} \Bigl(\Bigl\{\frac{n}{p}\Bigr\}-\frac12\Bigr)\log p\Bigr| \le \varepsilon k$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-1094--h3--h3--h2--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\forall C\in\mathbb{N},\ \delta>0\ \exists K_5\ \forall n,k\in\mathbb{N},\ K_5<k,\ k^2\le C n\lfloor\log_2 k\rfloor,\ n<k^2,\ \forall \sigma\in[0,1]:\quad \Bigl|\sum_{\substack{p \text{ prime}\\ k/2<p<11k/20}}\ [\{n/p\}<\sigma]\,\log p \;-\; \sigma \sum_{\substack{p \text{ prime}\\ k/2<p<11k/20}} \log p\Bigr| \le \delta k$
erdos-172open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Whether every finite colouring of the natural numbers has arbitrarily large finite sets all of whose distinct-element sums and products share one colour.

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/172
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-172the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-212open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Is there a dense subset of ℝ^2 such that all pairwise distances are rational?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/212
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-212the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-251open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Is $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{p_n}{2^n}$ irrational? Here $p_n$ is the $n$-th prime ($p_1=2, p_2=3, \dots$).

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/251
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-251the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-257open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Let $A\subseteq\mathbb{N}$ be an infinite set. Is $$ \sum_{n\in A} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} $$ irrational?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/257
ProvedExplainedWritten up Steward · Michael Higgins self-admitted 69 files need words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-257the problem's statementopen4 attemptsWork on this →
ShowHide 41 more statements, 14 open
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-257--h1left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$0 \notin A,\ \sum_{a\in A} \frac{1}{2^a-1} = r \in \mathbb{Q} \implies \forall n \ge 1:\ n \in A \iff \frac{1}{2^n-1} \le r - \sum_{a \in A,\, a<n} \frac{1}{2^a-1}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-257--h18derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$A \subseteq \mathbb{N} \text{ infinite} \Rightarrow A \in \mathcal{C}_1 \cup \cdots \cup \mathcal{C}_{15} \ \lor\ \sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-257--h2left open by a proof skeletonopen5 attemptsWork on this →$\forall\, r\in\mathbb{Q},\ \forall\, G\subseteq\mathbb{N}:\quad 0\notin G,\ \ \Bigl(\forall n\ge 1:\ n\in G \iff \frac{1}{2^n-1} \le r-\sum_{a\in G,\ a<n}\frac{1}{2^a-1}\Bigr),\ \ \sum_{a\in G}\frac{1}{2^a-1}=r \ \Longrightarrow\ G \text{ is finite}.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-257--h2--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$r \in \mathbb{Q},\ G = \{n \ge 1 : \tfrac{1}{2^n-1} \le r - \sum_{a \in G,\, a<n} \tfrac{1}{2^a-1}\} \Rightarrow G \text{ finite or } \{n \ge 1\} \setminus G \text{ finite}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-137537c8 Opn.erdos_257_lambert_identityproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, A \subseteq \mathbb{N}:\qquad \sum_{a\in A}\frac{1}{2^a-1} \;=\; \sum_{m\ge 1}\frac{f_A(m)}{2^m},\qquad f_A(m) = \#\{a \in A : a \mid m\}.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-23b0fff0 Opn.erdos_257_lambert_tail_integralproposed by a contributoropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\forall\, A \subseteq \mathbb{N},\ p \in \mathbb{Z},\ q \ge 1:\qquad \sum_{a\in A}\frac{1}{2^a-1} = \frac{p}{q}\ \Longrightarrow\ \forall j \ge 0:\quad q\,T_j \;=\; p\,2^{j} - q\sum_{m=0}^{j} f_A(m)\,2^{\,j-m},$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-5e2e0890 Opn.erdos_257_subsum_injectiveproposed by a contributorproved1 attemptView proof →$A, B \subseteq \mathbb{N},\quad 0 \notin A,\quad 0 \notin B,\quad \sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{2^n-1} \;=\; \sum_{n\in B}\frac{1}{2^n-1} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad A = B .$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-5e2e0890--h1 spec_5e2e0890__h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{m \ge 0} \frac{1}{2^m - 1} < \infty \text{ (with Lean's convention } 1/0 = 0 \text{ at } m = 0)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-5e2e0890--h2 spec_5e2e0890__h2derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$g \ge 0 \text{ summable}, \sum_{k \ge 0} g(n+1+k) < g(n), n \in S \setminus T, S \cap [0,n) = T \cap [0,n) \implies \sum_{T} g < \sum_{S} g$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-689ac1ac Opn.erdos_257_divisible_blockproposed by a contributoropen0 attemptsWork on this →
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) spec-a70fcca4 Opn.erdos_257_half_is_a_subsumproposed by a contributorsuperseded1 attemptBlocked
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-a70fcca4--h1 spec_a70fcca4__h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, r:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}:\quad r_0=\tfrac12,\ \ \forall m:\ r_{m+1}=\begin{cases} r_m-\dfrac{1}{2^m-1} & \text{if } \dfrac{1}{2^m-1}\le r_m,\\[4pt] r_m & \text{otherwise}\end{cases} \ \Longrightarrow\ \forall m:\ \ 0\le r_m \ \text{ and } \sum_{\substack{a<m\\ \frac{1}{2^a-1}\le r_a}}\frac{1}{2^a-1}=\frac12-r_m .$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-a70fcca4--h2 spec_a70fcca4__h2derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{a\in S} \frac{1}{2^a-1} \ne \frac12 \quad\text{for every finite } S \subseteq \mathbb{N}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-a70fcca4--h3 spec_a70fcca4__h3derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{n\ge 0} \frac{1}{2^n-1} < \infty$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-a70fcca4--h4 spec_a70fcca4__h4derived by the compileropen3 attemptsWork on this →$\forall\, r:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}:\quad r_0=\tfrac12,\ \ \forall m:\ r_{m+1}=\begin{cases} r_m-\dfrac{1}{2^m-1} & \text{if } \dfrac{1}{2^m-1}\le r_m,\\[4pt] r_m & \text{otherwise}\end{cases} \ \Longrightarrow\ \forall m:\ r_m\le\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{k+m}-1}.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-a70fcca4--h4--h1 spec_a70fcca4__h4__h1derived by the compileropen5 attemptsWork on this →$\forall\, r:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{R}:\quad r_0=\tfrac12,\ \ \forall m:\ r_{m+1}=\begin{cases} r_m-\dfrac{1}{2^m-1} & \text{if } \dfrac{1}{2^m-1}\le r_m,\\[4pt] r_m & \text{otherwise}\end{cases} \ \Longrightarrow\ \forall m:\ \ r_m<\frac{1}{2^m-1}\ \Rightarrow\ r_m\le\frac{1}{2^m}+\frac{1}{3\cdot 4^m}.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-a70fcca4--h4--h1--h1 spec_a70fcca4__h4__h1__h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$m \ge 2 \ \wedge\ r_m < \frac{1}{2^m-1} \ \Longrightarrow\ \exists n,\ m < n \le 2m \ \wedge\ r_n < \frac{1}{2^n-1}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-a70fcca4--h4--h1--h2 spec_a70fcca4__h4__h1__h2derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$m \ge 1 \ \wedge\ r_m < \frac{1}{2^m-1} \ \Longrightarrow\ \exists n,\ m < n \le 3m+2 \ \wedge\ r_n < \frac{1}{2^n-1}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-a70fcca4-v2 Opn.erdos_257_half_is_a_subsuma variant that refutes the problemopen0 attemptsWork on this →$\exists\, A \subseteq \mathbb{N}\ \text{infinite with}\ \sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{2^n-1} \;=\; \frac12 .$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-ddd99827 Opn.erdos_257_tail_lt_termproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^{\,n+1+k}-1} \;<\; \frac{1}{2^{n}-1} \qquad \text{for every integer } n \ge 1 .$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-037e597da partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{n \in \{2^k : k \in \mathbb{N}\} \cup \{3^k : k \in \mathbb{N}\}} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-1629563fa partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subseteq \mathbb{N}:\quad A \text{ infinite},\ 0 \notin A,\ \Bigl(\forall C \in \mathbb{N}\ \exists m \in A\ \exists L \in \mathbb{N}:\ L > 0,\ \bigl(\forall a \in A,\ a < m \Rightarrow (2^a - 1) \mid L\bigr),\ 2^C L \le 2^m\Bigr) \ \Longrightarrow\ \sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-2a349f4fa related variantproved0 attemptsView proof →$C = \Bigl\{\, \sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \;:\; A \subseteq \mathbb{N} \,\Bigr\} \subseteq \mathbb{R}\ \text{ is compact and perfect, and } \operatorname{int} C = \emptyset .$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-2f5236aaa partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^n-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-41d1f19ba partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subseteq \mathbb{N}:\quad A \text{ infinite},\ 0 \notin A,\ \Bigl(\forall C \in \mathbb{N}\ \exists m \in A:\ C + \sum_{a \in A,\ a < m} a \le m\Bigr) \ \Longrightarrow\ \sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-5274cf38a partial route to the problemproved2 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, A \subseteq \mathbb{N} \text{ infinite}:\quad \bigl(\exists\, p \ge 1,\ N:\ \forall n \ge N,\ n \in A \iff n + p \in A\bigr) \ \Longrightarrow\ \sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{2^n-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-5274cf38--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\forall B \subseteq \mathbb{N},\ \bigl(B \neq \emptyset \wedge \exists p \ge 1\ \forall n,\ (n \in B \iff n + p \in B)\bigr) \Rightarrow \sum_{n \in B} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-5c939e77a related variantproved0 attemptsView proof →$\Bigl\{\, A \subseteq \mathbb{N} \ :\ 0 \notin A,\ \ \sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{2^n-1} \in \mathbb{Q} \,\Bigr\} \ \text{ is countable}.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-6b364d2ba partial route to the problemopen3 attemptsWork on this →$\sum_{p \text{ prime}}\frac{1}{2^p-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-6b364d2b--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\forall q \ge 1\ \exists c_0 > 0\ \forall \delta > 0:\ \text{a prime cube } p_\varepsilon = p_0 + \textstyle\sum_k \varepsilon_k v_k, \text{ a finite set of } n \text{ obeying (5.5)--(5.6), a split } S_0 \sqcup S_1 \sqcup S_2 \text{ of the primes} \le B \text{ with } X_p \text{ constant on } S_0,\ |X_p| \le \delta \text{ on } S_1,\ M \text{ even},\ \kappa_1, \dots, \kappa_5 \le \delta,\ \sum_{p \in S_1} \operatorname{Var} X_p \ge c_0$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-6b364d2b--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\forall q \ge 1,\ T,\ \delta > 0,\ P_0\ \ \exists P \ge P_0,\ 2^K \le (\log P)^{2/3},\ H \le (\log P)^{2/3}\ \ \forall (p_0, v)\ \ \exists (N_s, S_1, S_2, M, \eta, w, R):\ \kappa_2, \kappa_3, \kappa_4, \kappa_5 \le \delta,\ \sum_{\varepsilon} \frac{1+\eta}{p_\varepsilon} \le \delta,\ \frac{q}{2^{K+1}} \le \delta,\ 2^K T \le \log\log R - \log\log w$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-77c0756ea partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, x, y : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N},\quad \Big(x_0, y_0 > 0,\ \ x_j \mid x_{j+1},\ y_j \mid y_{j+1},\ 3x_j \le x_{j+1},\ 3y_j \le y_{j+1}\ \text{for all } j\Big) \;\Longrightarrow\; \sum_{n \in \{x_j\} \cup \{y_j\}} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-7a0f5735a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, k \ge 1:\qquad \sum_{m \in \{n^k \,:\, n \in \mathbb{N}\}} \frac{1}{2^m-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-886b66daa partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, a, d \in \mathbb{N},\ d \ge 1:\qquad \sum_{m \in \{a + dn \,:\, n \ge 0\}} \frac{1}{2^m-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-90827f46a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, r \ge 1,\ \forall\, c_0, \dots, c_{r-1} : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N},\quad \Big(c_i(0) > 0,\ \ (2r+1)^{r+1}\, c_i(j) \le c_i(j+1)\ \text{for all } i, j\Big) \;\Longrightarrow\; \sum_{n \in \bigcup_i \{c_i(j) : j \in \mathbb{N}\}} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-970a2ffaa partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{n \ \text{squarefree}} \frac{1}{2^n-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-c91009b9a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, A \subseteq \mathbb{N} \text{ infinite, pairwise coprime, with } \sum_{n\in A}\frac1n < \infty:\qquad \sum_{n\in A}\frac{1}{2^n-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-d08712d9a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{m \,\in\, \{a^2+b^2 \,:\, a,\, b \in \mathbb{N}\}} \frac{1}{2^m-1} \ \text{ is irrational}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-d144ccc1a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subseteq \mathbb{N}:\quad A \text{ infinite},\ 0 \notin A,\ \bigl(\exists N\ \forall m, n \in A:\ N \le n < m \Rightarrow 2n \le m\bigr) \ \Longrightarrow\ \sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-f93b89d8a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, a, b \in \mathbb{N},\quad 2 \le a < b \;\Longrightarrow\; \sum_{n \in \{a^k : k \in \mathbb{N}\} \cup \{b^k : k \in \mathbb{N}\}} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \notin \mathbb{Q}.$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-f9c7b81ba related variantproved0 attemptsView proof →$\lambda\left(\left\{\, \sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{2^n - 1} \;:\; A \subseteq \mathbb{N} \,\right\}\right) = 1$
erdos-324open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Does there exist a polynomial $f(x)\in\mathbb{Z}[x]$ such that all the sums $f(a)+f(b)$ with $a < b$ nonnegative integers are distinct?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/324
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-324the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-376open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Whether infinitely many n have the central binomial coefficient C(2n, n) coprime to 105.

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/376
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-376the problem's statementopen1 attemptWork on this →
erdos-402open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Prove that, for any finite set $A\subset\mathbb{N}$, there exist $a, b\in A$ such that $$ \gcd(a, b)\leq a/|A|. $$

Statement from formal-conjectures (FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/402.lean) · erdosproblems.com/402; the record lists no licensed source text.
ProvedExplainedWritten up Calibration target, no steward needed 91 files need words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402the problem's statementopen2 attemptsWork on this →
ShowHide 35 more statements, 7 open
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-402--h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite},\ \forall m \in \mathbb{N}:\ 0 \notin A,\ \bigl(\forall a, b \in A,\ a \le m \cdot \gcd(a,b)\bigr) \Rightarrow \forall a, b \in A\ \exists\, u, v \in \mathbb{N}:\ 0 < u \le m,\ 0 < v \le m,\ \gcd(u,v) = 1,\ a v = b u$
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) erdos-402--h2derived by the compilersuperseded0 attemptsBlocked$\Bigl(\forall B \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin B,\ |B| = |A|,\ \gcd(B) = 1 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \bigl\lfloor \tfrac{a}{|B|} \bigr\rfloor\Bigr) \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \Bigl\lfloor \frac{a}{|A|} \Bigr\rfloor$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-402--h2-v2derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\Bigl(\forall B \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin B,\ |B| = |A|,\ \gcd(B) = 1 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \tfrac{a}{|B|}\Bigr) \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) erdos-402--h3derived by the compilersuperseded0 attemptsBlocked$0 \notin A,\ A \ne \emptyset,\ \gcd(A) = 1,\ \bigl(\forall a, b \in A\ \exists\, u, v:\ 0 < u \le |A|,\ 0 < v \le |A|,\ \gcd(u,v) = 1,\ a v = b u\bigr) \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \Bigl\lfloor \frac{a}{|A|} \Bigr\rfloor$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402--h3-v2derived by the compileropen1 attemptWork on this →$0 \notin A,\ A \ne \emptyset,\ \gcd(A) = 1,\ \bigl(\forall a, b \in A\ \exists\, u, v:\ 0 < u \le |A|,\ 0 < v \le |A|,\ \gcd(u,v) = 1,\ a v = b u\bigr) \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402--h3-v2--h1derived by the compileropen1 attemptWork on this →$\begin{aligned}&0 \notin B,\ B \ne \emptyset,\ \gcd(B) = 1,\ |B|\ \text{not prime},\ |B| \ne q + 1\ \text{for every prime } q,\\&\forall a, b \in B:\ a \le |B| \cdot \gcd(a,b),\qquad \forall a \in B,\ \forall p\ \text{prime},\ \forall k \in \mathbb{N}:\ p^k \mid a \Rightarrow p^k < |B|\\&\Longrightarrow\ \exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|B|}\end{aligned}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402--h3-v2--h1--h1derived by the compileropen1 attemptWork on this →$\begin{aligned}&0 \notin B,\ B \ne \emptyset,\ \gcd(B) = 1,\ |B|\ \text{not prime},\ |B| \ne q + 1\ \text{for every prime } q,\\&\forall a, b \in B:\ a \le |B| \cdot \gcd(a,b),\qquad \forall a \in B,\ \forall p\ \text{prime},\ \forall k \in \mathbb{N}:\ p^k \mid a \Rightarrow p^k < |B|\\&\Longrightarrow\ \bigl(\exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|B|}\bigr) \vee \bigl(\exists\, p\ \text{prime}:\ |B| \le 2p,\ \exists\, a \in B,\ p \mid a\bigr)\end{aligned}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402--h3-v2--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\begin{aligned}&0 \notin B,\ B \ne \emptyset,\ \gcd(B) = 1,\ |B|\ \text{not prime},\ |B| \ne q + 1\ \text{for every prime } q,\\&\forall a, b \in B:\ a \le |B| \cdot \gcd(a,b),\qquad \forall a \in B,\ \forall p\ \text{prime},\ \forall k \in \mathbb{N}:\ p^k \mid a \Rightarrow p^k < |B|\\&\Longrightarrow\ \bigl(\exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|B|}\bigr) \vee \bigl(\exists\, p\ \text{prime}:\ |B| \le 3p,\ \exists\, a \in B,\ p \mid a\bigr)\end{aligned}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402--h3-v2--h1--h1--h1--h1derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$\begin{aligned}&0 \notin B,\ B \ne \emptyset,\ \gcd(B) = 1,\ |B|\ \text{not prime},\ |B| \ne q + 1\ \text{for every prime } q,\\&\forall a, b \in B:\ a \le |B| \cdot \gcd(a,b),\qquad \forall a \in B,\ \forall p\ \text{prime},\ \forall k \in \mathbb{N}:\ p^k \mid a \Rightarrow p^k < |B|\\&\Longrightarrow\ \bigl(\exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|B|}\bigr) \vee \bigl(\exists\, p\ \text{prime}:\ |B| < p < 2|B|,\ (2|B| - p)(2|B| - p) \le |B|\bigr)\end{aligned}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402--h3-v2--h1--h1--h1--h2derived by the compileropen1 attemptWork on this →$n = |B|:\quad \bigl(\exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|B|}\bigr) \vee \Bigl(\exists\, p\ \text{prime}:\ n < p < 2n,\ 2(2n - p) \le n + 2,\ \forall \alpha < n,\ p < \alpha + n \Rightarrow \bigl(\exists\, q\ \text{prime}:\ n \le 3q,\ q \mid \alpha (p - \alpha)\bigr) \vee \bigl(\forall x < y,\ x y \mid \alpha \Rightarrow n x \le \alpha y\bigr)\Bigr)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-402--h3-v2--h1--h1--h1--h2--h1derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n \in \mathbb{N},\ 10 \le n \le 228:\ \exists\, p\ \text{prime}:\ n < p < 2n,\ 2(2n - p) \le n + 2,\ \forall \alpha < n,\ p < \alpha + n \Rightarrow \bigl(\exists\, q\ \text{prime}:\ n \le 3q,\ q \mid \alpha (p - \alpha)\bigr) \vee \bigl(\forall x < y,\ x y \mid \alpha \Rightarrow n x \le \alpha y\bigr)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-402--h3-v2--h1--h1--h1--h2--h2derived by the compilerproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n \in \mathbb{N},\ 229 \le n \le 200014:\ \exists\, p\ \text{prime}:\ n < p < 2n,\ 2(2n - p) \le n + 2,\ \forall \alpha < n,\ p < \alpha + n \Rightarrow \bigl(\exists\, q\ \text{prime}:\ n \le 3q,\ q \mid \alpha (p - \alpha)\bigr) \vee \bigl(\forall x < y,\ x y \mid \alpha \Rightarrow n x \le \alpha y\bigr)$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-402--h3-v2--h1--h1--h1--h2--h3derived by the compileropen0 attemptsWork on this →$n = |B| > 200014:\quad \bigl(\exists\, a, b \in B:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|B|}\bigr) \vee \Bigl(\exists\, p\ \text{prime}:\ n < p < 2n,\ 2(2n - p) \le n + 2,\ \forall \alpha < n,\ p < \alpha + n \Rightarrow \bigl(\exists\, q\ \text{prime}:\ n \le 3q,\ q \mid \alpha (p - \alpha)\bigr) \vee \bigl(\forall x < y,\ x y \mid \alpha \Rightarrow n x \le \alpha y\bigr)\Bigr)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-48bd0126 Opn.erdos_402_max_fraction_formproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n \in \mathbb{N},\ \forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}\ \text{nonempty},\ M = \max A:\ 0 \notin A,\ \bigl(\forall x \in A,\ M < \gcd(M, x) \cdot n\bigr) \Rightarrow \forall x \in A \setminus \{M\}\ \exists\, j, k \in \mathbb{N}:\ 1 \le j < k < n,\ k x = j M$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-fa8046e4 Opn.erdos_402_card_of_colouringproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\begin{aligned}&n \ge 2,\ L > 0,\ S \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite},\ c : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N},\\&\forall k < n,\ \forall j < k,\ j > 0:\ k \mid L j\ \wedge\ L j / k \in S,\qquad \forall a \in S:\ c(a) + 2 < n,\\&\forall a, b \in S,\ a \ne b,\ c(a) = c(b):\ n \cdot \gcd(a,b) \le a\ \vee\ n \cdot \gcd(a,b) \le b\\&\Longrightarrow\ \forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = n \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}\end{aligned}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-11152e83a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 12 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-29101bbca partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 25 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-3377fd96a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A \Rightarrow \forall x \in A,\ |A| \le \operatorname{minFac}(x) \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-4ad214d0definitionproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 15 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-64035064a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 16 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-6bb50ad7a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 8 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-6bd06d63a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 3 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-77918742a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ A \ne \emptyset,\ |A| \le 24 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-780e7adea partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 4 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-7a4bb0cda partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 11 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-892f5809a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 9 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-950630b9a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ \bigl(\exists\, m \in A,\ \exists\, b \in A:\ (\forall c \in A,\ c \le m) \wedge \gcd(m, b) = 1\bigr) \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-9724698ea partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 13 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-a3b3cb8fa partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 7 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-a5969ff3a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 10 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-a874fe93a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A \Rightarrow \forall p \in A,\ p\ \text{prime},\ |A| \le p \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-b89de5c4a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 18 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-bc28297ca partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 5 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-d865c9c6a partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 2 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-e6d83e6da partial route to the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall A \subset \mathbb{N}\ \text{finite}:\ 0 \notin A,\ |A| = 6 \Rightarrow \exists\, a, b \in A:\ \gcd(a,b) \le \frac{a}{|A|}$
erdos-406open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Whether only finitely many powers of two have base-three expansions using only the digits 0 and 1.

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/406
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-406the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-410open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Let $σ_1(n) = σ(n)$, the sum of divisors function, and $σ_k(n) = σ(σ_{k-1}(n))$. Is it true that $\lim_{k → ∞} σ_k(n)^{\frac 1 k} = ∞$? This is problem (iii) from Erdos, Granville, Pomerance, Spiro "On the normal behavior of the iterates of some arithmetical functions" (page 169 of the book "Analytic Number Theory", 1990).

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/410
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-410the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-412open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Let $σ_1(n)=σ(n)$, the sum of divisors function, and $σ_k(n) = σ(σ_{k-1}(n))$. Is it true that, for every $m, n ≥ 2$, there exist some $i, j$ such that $σ_i(m) = σ_j(n)$?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/412
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 4 files need words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-412the problem's statementopen1 attemptWork on this →
ShowHide 2 more statements, 1 open
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) erdos-412--h1left open by a proof skeletonsuperseded0 attemptsBlocked$\forall m\ge 3:\quad \bigl(\neg\,\exists x,\ 2\le x<m\ \wedge\ \exists k,\ \sigma^{[k]}(x)=m\bigr)\ \Rightarrow\ \exists m',\ 2\le m'<m\ \wedge\ \exists i,j,\ \sigma^{[i]}(m)=\sigma^{[j]}(m')$
Left open by a proof skeleton and waiting only for its witness. Supplying one is the work here and anyone may do it; once it merges, the statement is open for proof. protocol: blocked · cause witness-missing · on the frontier erdos-412--h1-v2left open by a proof skeletonneeds a witness0 attemptsSupply a witness →$\forall m\ge 3:\quad \bigl(\neg\,\exists x,\ 2\le x<m\ \wedge\ \exists k,\ \sigma^{[k]}(x)=m\bigr)\ \Rightarrow\ \exists m',\ 2\le m'<m\ \wedge\ \exists i,j,\ \sigma^{[i]}(m)=\sigma^{[j]}(m')$
erdos-417open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Let$$V'(x)=\#\{\phi(m) : 1\leq m\leq x\}$$and$$V(x)=\#\{\phi(m) \leq x : 1\leq m\}.$$ Does $\lim V(x)/V'(x)$ exist?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/417
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-417the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-51open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Is there an infinite set $A \subset \mathbb{N}$ such that for every $a \in A$, there is an integer n such that $\phi(n)=a$, and yet if $n_a$ is the smallest such integer, then $\frac{n_a}{a} → \infty$ as $a → ∞$?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/51
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-51the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-52open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Whether for every ε>0 a finite set of integers has either its sumset or its product set of size at least a constant times |A|^(2−ε).

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/52
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-52the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-68open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Whether the series summing 1/(n!-1) over n at least 2 has an irrational value.

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/68
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-68the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-69open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Is $$ \sum_{n\geq 2}\frac{\omega(n)}{2^n} $$ irrational? (Here $\omega(n)$ counts the number of distinct prime divisors of $n$.)

Statement from formal-conjectures (FormalConjectures/ErdosProblems/69.lean) · erdosproblems.com/69; the record lists no licensed source text.
ProvedExplainedWritten up Calibration target, no steward needed 46 files need words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-69the problem's statementopen2 attemptsWork on this →
ShowHide 22 more statements, 3 open
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) erdos-69--h1left open by a proof skeletonsuperseded0 attemptsBlocked$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\uparrow\omega(n)}{2^{n}} = \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{\uparrow p}-1}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-69--h1-v2left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(n)}{2^{n}} = \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{p}-1}$
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) erdos-69--h2left open by a proof skeletonsuperseded0 attemptsBlocked$\Bigl(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\uparrow\omega(n)}{2^{n}} = \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{\uparrow p}-1}\Bigr) \;\Rightarrow\; \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{p}-1}\notin\mathbb{Q}$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-69--h2-v2left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\Bigl(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(n)}{2^{n}} = \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{p}-1}\Bigr) \;\Rightarrow\; \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{p}-1}\notin\mathbb{Q}$
Replaced by a corrected version of the same statement. It keeps its history and any credit already earned; work goes to the newer version. protocol: superseded (D-8) erdos-69--h2-v2--h1derived by the compilersuperseded0 attemptsBlocked$\Bigl(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\uparrow\omega(n)}{2^{n}} = \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{\uparrow p}-1}\Bigr) \Rightarrow \forall b\in\mathbb{N},\ b>0\ \ \exists N\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \forall z\in\mathbb{Z}:\ \uparrow b\cdot\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\uparrow\omega(N+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} \ne \uparrow z$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-69--h2-v2--h1-v2derived by the compileropen2 attemptsWork on this →$\Bigl(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(n)}{2^{n}} = \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{p}-1}\Bigr) \Rightarrow \forall b\in\mathbb{N},\ b>0\ \ \exists N\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \forall z\in\mathbb{Z}:\ b\cdot\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(N+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} \ne z$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-69--h2-v2--h1-v2--h1left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall N,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad \sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(N+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} = \sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\frac{\omega(N+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} + \frac{1}{2^{k}}\sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(N+k+1+j)}{2^{j+1}}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-69--h2-v2--h1-v2--h2left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall M\in\mathbb{N}:\quad 0 < \sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(M+1+j)}{2^{j+1}}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved erdos-69--h2-v2--h1-v2--h3left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall M\in\mathbb{N}:\quad \sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(M+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} \le \log_{2}(M+1) + 1$
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-69--h2-v2--h1-v2--h4left open by a proof skeletonopen1 attemptWork on this →$\forall b\in\mathbb{N},\ b>0\ \ \exists N,k\in\mathbb{N}:\quad \Bigl(b\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\omega(N+1+j)\,2^{\,k-1-j}\Bigr)\bmod 2^{k} \;+\; b\bigl(\log_{2}(N+k+1)+1\bigr) < 2^{k}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-13f68833 Opn.erdos_69_tail_le_of_linear_boundproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N},\ C\in\mathbb{R}:\quad \Bigl(\forall k\in\mathbb{N},\ \omega(n+1+k) \le C\,(k+1)\Bigr) \Rightarrow \sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(n+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} \le 2C$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-2e765953 Opn.erdos_69_summable_prime_reciprocalproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{2^{p}-1} < \infty$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-7d098d5c Opn.erdos_69_mertens_reciprocal_primesproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\exists C\ge 0\ \ \forall x\in\mathbb{N},\ x\ge 2:\quad \Bigl\lvert \sum_{p\le x,\ p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{p} - \log\log x \Bigr\rvert \le C$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-7f0efe19 Opn.erdos_69_omega_windowproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall k\in\mathbb{N},\ \forall c:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}\ \ \exists N\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \forall j<k:\quad c(j) \le \omega(N+1+j)$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-84446025 Opn.erdos_69_rational_dilated_tails_near_integersproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}\Bigl\lvert q\,D_a(b+Qt) - \operatorname{round}\bigl(q\,D_a(b+Qt)\bigr)\Bigr\rvert \le q\sum_{p\mid a}\Bigl(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{T}\Bigr),\qquad D_a(m) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega\bigl(a(m+k+1)\bigr)}{2^{k+1}}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-9f8cb4ea Opn.erdos_69_dilated_tail_closedproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall a,m\in\mathbb{N},\ a\ne 0:\quad \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega\bigl(a(m+k+1)\bigr)}{2^{k+1}} = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(m+k+1)}{2^{k+1}} + \omega(a) - \sum_{p\mid a}\frac{2^{\,m \bmod p}}{2^{p}-1}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-c390279b Opn.erdos_69_rational_tails_periodicproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\exists p>0,\ N_0\ \ \forall n,n'\ge N_0,\ n\equiv n' \pmod p\ \ \exists z\in\mathbb{Z}:\quad \sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{f(n+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} - \sum_{j=0}^{\infty}\frac{f(n'+1+j)}{2^{j+1}} = z$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved spec-e0b917d1 Opn.erdos_69_rough_dilation_reciprocalproposed by a contributorproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall P,j\in\mathbb{N},\ 2\le P,\ j\le P:\quad \sum_{p\mid 1+P\#\,(1+j)}\frac{1}{p} \le \frac{5}{\log P}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-09e95e7aa related variantproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\bigl[n\ \text{prime}\bigr]\Bigl(\frac{1}{2}\Bigr)^{n} \notin\mathbb{Q}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-14c6c771a related variantproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall m\in\mathbb{N},\ m\ge 1:\quad \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\bigl[\omega(n)=m\bigr]\Bigl(\frac{1}{2}\Bigr)^{n} \notin\mathbb{Q}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-3a1bcb9aa related variantproved0 attemptsView proof →$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\omega(n)}{n!} \notin\mathbb{Q}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-f592e3aba related variantproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall b\in\mathbb{N},\ b\ge 2:\quad \sum_{p\ \text{prime}}\frac{1}{b^{p}} \notin\mathbb{Q}$
erdos-727open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Let $k ≥ 2$. Does $((n+k)!)^2∣(2n)!$ hold for infinitely many $n$?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/727
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-727the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-849open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Is it true that, for every integer $t\geq1$, there is some integer $a$ such that ${n \choose k} = a$ with $1\leq k \le \frac{n}{2}$ has exactly $t$ solutions?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/849
ProvedExplainedWritten up Steward · WilliamVerreault self-admitted 16 files need words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-849the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
ShowHide 6 more statements, 6 open
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-12191c69 Opn.erdos_849_rows_eq_pairsproposed by a contributoropen0 attemptsWork on this →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier spec-38faff03 Opn.erdos_849_rows_leproposed by a contributoropen0 attemptsWork on this →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-0691f5bba partial route to the problemopen0 attemptsWork on this →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-293c7f51a partial route to the problemopen0 attemptsWork on this →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-3d9db4a5a partial route to the problemopen0 attemptsWork on this →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-c9253839a partial route to the problemopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-850open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Can there exist two distinct integers $x$ and $y$ such that $x,y$ have the same prime factors, $x+1,y+1$ have the same prime factors, and $x+2,y+2$ also have the same prime factors?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/850
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-850the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-931open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Let $k_1 \geq k_2 \geq 3$. Are there only finitely many $n_2\geq n_1 + k_1$ such that $$ \prod_{1\leq i\leq k_1}(n_1 + i)\ \text{and}\ \prod_{1\leq j\leq k_2} (n_2 + j) $$ have the same prime factors?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/931
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-931the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
erdos-952open Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

Is there an infinite sequence of distinct Gaussian primes $x_1,x_2,\ldots$ such that $\lvert x_{n+1}-x_n\rvert \ll 1$?

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0) · erdosproblems.com/952
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier erdos-952the problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
euclid-primesproved Its root statement has a merged proof. Not yet explained or written up. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

For every natural number n there is a prime greater than n.

Statement from Euclid, Elements IX.20; the record lists no licensed source text.
ProvedExplainedWritten up Steward wanted for write-up 29 files need words View the graph →
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved infinitude-of-primesthe problem's statementproved2 attemptsView proof →
ShowHide 12 more statements
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved infinitude-of-primes--h1left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →For all natural numbers $n$ and $k$: if $0 < k$ and $k \le n$, then $k$ divides $n!$.
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved infinitude-of-primes--h2left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →The theorem infinitude_of_primes__h2 asserts the following.
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved infinitude-of-primes--h3left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}:\ \bigl(\forall k,\ 0<k\le n\Rightarrow k\mid n!\bigr)\Rightarrow\bigl(\forall m\ge 2,\ \exists p,\ p\ \text{prime}\wedge p\mid m\bigr)\Rightarrow\ \forall d,m\in\mathbb{N},\ d\mid m\ \wedge\ d\mid m+1\ \Rightarrow\ d=1$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved infinitude-of-primes--h4left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}:\ \bigl(\forall k,\ 0<k\le n\Rightarrow k\mid n!\bigr)\Rightarrow\bigl(\forall m\ge 2,\ \exists p,\ p\ \text{prime}\wedge p\mid m\bigr)\Rightarrow\bigl(\forall d,m,\ d\mid m\wedge d\mid m+1\Rightarrow d=1\bigr)\Rightarrow\ \forall k\in\mathbb{N},\ 0<k!$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-2a7919a9a related variantproved1 attemptView proof →$\forall\, l\in\operatorname{List}(\mathbb{N})\ \ \exists p\in\mathbb{N}:\quad p\ \text{prime}\ \wedge\ p\notin l$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-2a7919a9--h1left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, l\in\operatorname{List}(\mathbb{N}),\ \forall x\in l:\quad x\le \sum l$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-2a7919a9--h2left open by a proof skeletonproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall\, l\in\operatorname{List}(\mathbb{N}):\quad \bigl(\forall x\in l,\ x\le \textstyle\sum l\bigr)\ \Rightarrow\ \exists p\in\mathbb{N},\ \textstyle\sum l<p\ \wedge\ p\ \text{prime}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-4cb87a03a variant that resolves the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \exists p\in\mathbb{N}:\quad n<p\ \wedge\ p\le n!+1\ \wedge\ p\ \text{prime}$
A route given up as unreachable, or killed by a counterexample. It stays on the record with its cause and is never deleted. protocol: abandoned (D-14) variant-6e71b160a related variantabandoned0 attemptsBlocked$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \exists p\in\mathbb{N}:\quad n<p\ \wedge\ \bigl(\exists k\in\mathbb{N},\ p=100+k\bigr)\ \wedge\ p\ \text{prime}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-aceabdc4a related variantproved1 attemptView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \exists p\in\mathbb{N}:\quad n<p\ \wedge\ 100\le p\ \wedge\ p\ \text{prime}$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-dea95969a variant that resolves the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\forall n\in\mathbb{N}\ \ \exists p\in\mathbb{N}:\quad n<p\ \wedge\ p\ \text{prime}\ \wedge\ p \bmod 4 = 3$
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved variant-f15ce396a variant that resolves the problemproved0 attemptsView proof →$\{\,p\in\mathbb{N}\ :\ p\ \text{prime}\,\}\ \text{is infinite}$
riemann-hypothesisopen Listed, and its statements accept work. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

The Riemann Hypothesis: all non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function have real part $\frac{1}{2}$. That is, if $\zeta(s) = 0$, $s \neq 1$, and $s$ is not a trivial zero $-2(n+1)$ for some $n \in \mathbb{N}$, then $\operatorname{Re}(s) = \frac{1}{2}$. This is the official Millennium Prize Problem as posed by the Clay Mathematics Institute. This uses the RiemannHypothesis type from Mathlib, which is defined as ∀ (s : ℂ), riemannZeta s = 0 → (¬∃ n : ℕ, s = -2 * (n + 1)) → s ≠ 1 → s.re = 1 / 2.

Imported from formal-conjectures (Apache-2.0)
ProvedExplainedWritten up Needs a steward 1 file needs words View problem →
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier riemann-hypothesisthe problem's statementopen0 attemptsWork on this →
tutorialproved Its root statement has a merged proof. Not yet explained or written up. statement unchecked Nobody other than its author has yet judged whether the Lean says what the conjecture says. The kernel cannot decide this; a person must. protocol: fidelity: mechanical-only

No informal statement is recorded for this problem yet.

No curated record yet.
ProvedExplainedWritten up Steward wanted for write-up 7 files need words View the graph →
A proof passed all nine checks and was merged. Proved is not the same as explained. protocol: proved tutorial-and-swapthe tutorial statementproved0 attemptsView proof →
ShowHide 3 more statements, 3 open
No proof has closed this statement and nothing blocks starting on it. Anyone may work on it now. protocol: ready · on the frontier variant-93e79cb5a related variantopen1 attemptWork on this →$\forall\, p\,q:\operatorname{Prop},\quad p\wedge q\ \Rightarrow\ p$
Left open by a proof skeleton and waiting only for its witness. Supplying one is the work here and anyone may do it; once it merges, the statement is open for proof. protocol: blocked · cause witness-missing · on the frontier variant-93e79cb5--h1left open by a proof skeletonneeds a witness0 attemptsSupply a witness →$\forall\, p\,q:\operatorname{Prop},\quad p\wedge q\ \Rightarrow\ q\wedge p$
Left open by a proof skeleton and waiting only for its witness. Supplying one is the work here and anyone may do it; once it merges, the statement is open for proof. protocol: blocked · cause witness-missing · on the frontier variant-93e79cb5--h2left open by a proof skeletonneeds a witness0 attemptsSupply a witness →$\forall\, p\,q:\operatorname{Prop},\quad p\wedge q\ \Rightarrow\ q\wedge p\ \Rightarrow\ q\wedge p\ \Rightarrow\ p$

Showing 27 of 27. Hashes, origins and pins live on each statement's record page and in frontier.json, which lists every open statement shown here. Claims are a snapshot from the products at f0c84d6adcfd: a claim made or released since then is not counted here. The live count is the service's /claims.json.